“ Funny that Barr said 17 still unidentified — not 16 or 18. Coincidence, I guess. “
If that is code, and there are actually NO unidentified as you suggest,
is Barr telling someone that “Q” is still “Unidentified” ?
(ie. [They] can’t stop what’s coming...?)
The question then becomes “Unidentified” by/for who, the Derp State?
~Easy
“ Funny that Barr said 17 still unidentified — not 16 or 18. Coincidence, I guess. “
If that is code, and there are actually NO unidentified as you suggest,
is Barr telling someone that “Q” is still “Unidentified” ?
(ie. [They] can’t stop what’s coming...?)
The question then becomes “Unidentified” by/for who, the Derp State?
~Easy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ve been thinking about that. I need to find the video (don’t know when I’ll have time) to see if that statement might be teasing a soon reveal of 17. But yes, I do think it means 17 has not been identified, YET.