This Writ will most likely be unceremoniously tossed. Lack of Standing, wrong Plaintiffs. Which is correct and in accordance with legal principles.
Attorneys that do not pay attention to prior court decisions and forge ahead despite the clear instruction of the court are pretty much committing malpractice and can get sanctioned.
In the Texas decision the SCOTUS made it very clear - the only persons that are actually damaged by what went on are the STATE LEGISLATURES because their constitutional rights were the ones violated, not your’s, not PDJT’s and not voter’s.
More likely lack of jurisdiction. Powell went right to the Supreme Court with this one and the court has appellate jurisdiction over these matters rather than original jurisdiction.
This Writ will most likely be unceremoniously tossed.
***************
If Democrats were the aggrieved party it probably would be treated differently. Just saying.
“the only persons that are actually damaged by what went on are the STATE LEGISLATURES because their constitutional rights were the ones violated, not your’s, not PDJT’s and not voter’s.”
The deluded Qtards can’t hear you.
They cannot come to grips with the fact not even ONE state house had named competing electors. And said they would not.
Now they imagine VP Pence shaking things up, or House/Senate votes refusing duly appointed electors.
It’s the weirdest mass delusion I’ve seen. Ever.
No it would not be correct.
In the Texas decision the SCOTUS made it very clear - the only persons that are actually damaged by what went on are the STATE LEGISLATURES because their constitutional rights were the ones violated, not your’s, not PDJT’s and not voter’s.
You read a lot it a very brief order. Where did they specify all of that?