[who_would_fardels_bear]

Why would investors pay him over $12 mil to get just $4 mil worth of coins?

Something is fishy and it ain't just the critters swimming through the wreck.

[TexasGator]

“Why would investors pay him over $12 mil to get just $4 mil worth of coins?
Something is fishy and it ain’t just the critters swimming through the wreck.”

$22 million for a possible $500 million.

[cuban leaf]

Why would investors pay him over $12 mil to get just $4 mil worth of coins?

---

That was the first weirdness I saw in the article.

I remember, about 12 years ago, listening to Kirby Wilbur (seattle talk radio) being indignant about an apparently unfair story and the people were calling in about how, yeah, that’s just crazy that the cops (or court) would do that. I wondered to myself if there was some tidbit being left out of the story that suddenly made their actions completly logical. I was thinking that because it sounded downright idiotic.

And yes, it turned out that there was such a tidbit. Suddenly it was a “dog bites man” story. It made total sense and everyone got all cranky over nothing.

I watch myself ever since. I try not to go off half-cocked until the story passes the reasonableness test. A perfect example is looking for more sources than just Gateway Pundit. :D