Disparate Impact for Thee, but Not for Me?

American Thinker ^ | 14 Dec, 2020 | Mark Andrew Dwyer

[MtnClimber]

There seem to be some disturbing double standards in the American legal system.

It must have been obvious to an intelligent observer that a lack of meaningful and publicly verifiable monitoring of elections integrity has disproportionately benefited Democrat candidates. So many times, when election processes or other circumstances facilitated fraud and cheating, it was the Democrat Party that was the foremost beneficiary of that facilitation. The 2020 presidential election is not an exception from that pattern.

We have seen it over and over again. Many races that Democrat candidates were decidedly losing during Election Day often ended up in their favor late at night or early next morning, when it was easier to stuff ballot boxes or to doctor the counting of the votes. This hardly ever happened to Republican candidates. The same tendency was observed in cases of a broken chain of custody of the ballots when it was easier to cure the original ballots, or replace them with fabricated ones, or inject fraudulent ballots from non-existing or ineligible voters, or discard the legitimate ballots, or coerce or bribe voters to vote certain way. For instance, in such cases as absentee voting, mail-in voting, and vote-harvesting (which was legalized in California a few years ago), it was by and large the Democrat Party that was benefiting from such breaks of the chain of custody and the opportunity to cheat that they facilitated.

In many cases of cheating and fraud, the numeric results were strikingly implausible or statistically so unlikely as to be, for all practical purposes, impossible. This was particularly true when a number of statistically unlikely changes and sudden unexpected spikes in the real-time vote counts happened almost simultaneously, usually late at night or early next morning

[MtnClimber]

The justice system and the media certainly seem to either be afraid or they are accomplices.