Skip to comments.
Gucci is selling upside-down glasses for £470 and people are confused
Metro (U.K.) ^
| Sunday 13 Dec 2020
| Laura Abernethy
Posted on 12/13/2020 10:07:41 PM PST by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: null and void
Glasses that bring out the inner-Karen in everybody...
To: nickcarraway
It’s been said that many (most?) fashion designers are homosexuals who have a psychological need to make women ugly.
22
posted on
12/14/2020 3:51:26 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
("This claim about election fraud is disputed.")
To: null and void
What are the pronouns that would be used to describe the thing wearing those ‘glasses’? Whatever the pronouns are, the thing is obviously too young to need bifocals.
23
posted on
12/14/2020 4:48:43 AM PST
by
norwaypinesavage
(Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
You’ve got to be kidding me. They picked one of the most unattractive women around to were these stupid things. Take those glasses off of her and she's attractive.
She knows how ridiculous they make her look, the photographer was unable to coax a smile out of her.
Or maybe he did, but any smile he got looked too forced and they had to settle for this image.
24
posted on
12/14/2020 5:11:03 AM PST
by
null and void
(My President is a Person Of Color, Orange is a Color...)
To: norwaypinesavage
What are the pronouns that would be used to describe the thing wearing those ‘glasses’? Wearing them? Whatever pronoun it demanded.
She when they're off.
25
posted on
12/14/2020 5:14:29 AM PST
by
null and void
(My President is a Person Of Color, Orange is a Color...)
To: nickcarraway; Ezekiel
Whatever the kardashians do, I'll do.
26
posted on
12/14/2020 5:20:14 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Mega Dittoes and Mega Prayers* & :))
To: lee martell
Yep. A look-at-me stunt.
Even those “2-0-0-0” glasses for NYE are more esthetic.
To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
WOMAN?! I thought that was Emo Phillips.
To: Moltke
>>Not the kind of thing you’d wear to a job interview.
Put the COEXIST symbols on the earpieces and you HAVE to land the job
To: Fresh Wind
>>It’s been said that many (most?) fashion designers are homosexuals who have a psychological need to make women ugly.
So do most drag queens
To: null and void
That’s her serious face.
If she cracked a wide grin everyone would think this is a novelty gag.
To: null and void
With the unusual hang, those glasses have got to be difficulty to fit proper prescription lenses. They have to be specially shaped. They won’t sit the same on your nose.
To: Daffynition
Obviously a result of "2020" vision.
33
posted on
12/14/2020 6:56:14 AM PST
by
Ezekiel
(The pun is mightier than the s-word. Goy to the World!)
To: Fresh Wind
...fashion designers are homosexuals who have a psychological need to make women ugly. Well, the model they're using here had a pretty good head start.
34
posted on
12/14/2020 8:04:32 AM PST
by
TangoLimaSierra
(Your tagline sucked, so it was deleted - Admin)
To: Ezekiel
Suddenly, I got a cat-a-rack
35
posted on
12/14/2020 4:39:42 PM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Mega Dittoes and Mega Prayers* & :))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson