[Disestablishmentarian]

I believe they did uphold the constitution. The denial was not on merit, it was on standing. A constitutionalist will do this whereas a political shill will not.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I agree.

Texas was a great case for exhibiting a nationwide coalition of states (which it succeeded in doing!) ... but the WRONG CASE for the SCOTUS to consider.

The precedent would have been AWFUL.

PLEASE CONSIDER: If this precedent were set, RAT states would go to SCOTUS to stop other states from allowing fracking, allowing cars, selling guns & ammo.

Anything their poor little RAT hearts thought was bothering them.

[KittenClaws]

PLEASE CONSIDER: If this precedent were set, RAT states would go to SCOTUS to stop other states from allowing fracking, allowing cars, selling guns & ammo.
———

Absolutely! You gave much better reference than I.

I’m thinking we should always look at our political actions from “how would we react if this was a liberal/socialist action.?

[cherry]

and you don't think for a minute that a state eg California wouldn't go after Nevada or Arizona for not having as pungent gun laws therefore affecting and hurting Californians?....

I'll tell you right now....the judges would agree....