Maybe the suit should be brought by a state that lost narrowly to Biden.
“Maybe the suit should be brought by a state that lost narrowly to Biden.”
I don’t know if that would be the answer. Until the illegal actions are considered unconstitutional, the SCOTUS is going to push back the challenge. And if anyone thinks liberals at state level are going to openly challenge their own successes, honest or otherwise, they are certifiable. So what the SCOTUS is saying is that certain states, with no accountability, can decide a national election with no way to question or investigate as there are no grounds, and determine what other states have voted for pro or con for them. This time....con.
If that’s the case, then we no longer need to vote as the governors can set up their electoral college voters to vote the way they want, and the states with the most electoral votes will determine the election. But 538 electors are not involved as it takes 270 only. And if the right 11 states determine to vote that way, and there are a few combinations, with no accountability, then only 22% of the states control 51% of the determination of office. I see a problem with the math here.
wy69