Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bobbo666

Let’s get this straight it was all 9 Justices.

Clarence Thomas said he would permit the filing but he said he WOULD GRANT NO FURTHER RELIEF.

The Supreme Court was not going to let one state sue over the way another state conducted its election.

That IS our republic.


12 posted on 12/12/2020 7:03:01 AM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Williams
"The Supreme Court was not going to let one state sue over the way another state conducted its election."

1) it wasn't "one state"...it was 20. 2) it was about "following the law", the ultimate point of the Constitution. Changes to the electoral process were made by other than the STATE legislature, which is the SOLE determinant of the STATE electoral process.

29 posted on 12/12/2020 7:12:44 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (No Longer Tolerating Trolls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson