Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gswilder
From the very beginning many legal scholars and advisor said the case would be tossed for lack of standing because what Texas was saying is more of a generalized grievance instead of a specific injury unique to Texas.

As more States filed to "intervene" it further supported the idea of a generalized grievance.

If your complaint is a generalized grievance you lack standing and the case is tossed.

SCOTUS made the right call here.

80 posted on 12/11/2020 7:26:21 PM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: tarpit
From the very beginning many legal scholars and advisor said the case would be tossed for lack of standing because what Texas was saying is more of a generalized grievance instead of a specific injury unique to Texas.

As more States filed to "intervene" it further supported the idea of a generalized grievance.

If your complaint is a generalized grievance you lack standing and the case is tossed.

SCOTUS made the right call here.


So, If I go out and rob several banks, none of them can sue me for it because there's several victims?

How is every single class action lawsuit not dismissed for your general grievance lack of standing?
99 posted on 12/11/2020 9:41:28 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson