Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Theodore R.
It would have been helpful if Trumps attorneys had-at some point in the 50 cases - argued fraud. They did not and many here know it and have states such and have made excuses that they were waiting for the SCOTUS. In fact, many times they even told the judges “we are NOT arguing fraud-but good faith clerical errors”-that was Rudy himself.

So-at some point you need to stop passing the buck.

8 posted on 12/11/2020 5:38:52 PM PST by NELSON111 (Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: NELSON111

The problem is that if you allege fraud in court, you have to point to specific inappropriate actions. It’s called a “heightened standard of pleading.” Giuliani couldn’t come up with evidence of fraud that they were willing to swear to before a court.


19 posted on 12/11/2020 5:46:04 PM PST by socalgop ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson