Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

Strangely enough the Army tried to adopt the Dauntless as the A-24, but found that dedicated dive bombers were too vulnerable and that fighter-bombers met their needs.
The Army did use A-24s to cover the retreat from the Java sea, but they took heavy casualties.


26 posted on 12/11/2020 11:40:31 AM PST by Little Ray (The Left and Right no longer have anything in common. A House divided against itself cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
It is also possible that the army air force despised close support missions. Their doctrine was "interdiction" to support the ground forces: killing bridges, staging areas, armor on the road and railroads. It is true that the SBD/A-24 would have had heavy losses against the Germans, unless that air defenses were accurately suppressed first.

But imagine what would have happened if A-24s or SB2Cs were used in direct support of the Normandy landing, taking out the bunkers and machine gun pits while the landing was under way at Omaha Beach. Just wasn't the air force way and those guys were just left with what they could carry and what little flat trajectory naval gunfire could hit that day.

MacArthur used Marine SBDs to support his scheme of maneuver on Luzon. Marine FACs used radio jeeps to direct the Marine pilots on target and the precise hits nailed Japanese defenses, saving soldier's lives and ending Japanese lives. It is said that MacArthur hated the Marine Corps - until he used them at Luzon.

40 posted on 12/11/2020 12:08:42 PM PST by Chainmail (Remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson