Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HotHunt
If the legislatures came up with none or only part of the total electors, then there may or may not be enough votes to to give one of the candidates 270, depending on the number of electors they picked.

depends...no state will want to be tagged as having no electors. If that should happen, then 270 is not the number.
the Constitution covers it...Article II, Section 1, and the 12th amendment:
"...The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed;..."

Let's say, PA does not have any electors appointed. Instead of 538, the count is now 518, so 260 would be the number. Biden still covers.

Now, what happens if PA has appointed electors but they are rejected by Congress during the count? Is the number 270? looks like it...Biden still covers...but who knows.

213 posted on 12/11/2020 6:41:20 PM PST by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a
Thanks but it all appears moot now that the SC has said no to Texas.

Talk about being bummed.

214 posted on 12/11/2020 6:51:16 PM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson