Posted on 12/11/2020 6:49:35 AM PST by 4Liberty
Tune in via Roku/AppleTV/AmazonFire with the America’s Voice App
PM tennmountainman if you want On/Off this list
https://pluto.tv/live-tv/americas-voice
https://americasvoice.app
Past episodes:
https://rumble.com/c/BannonsWarRoom
Bannon War Room - AM Show Ping!!!!
Looks like Youtube pulled his live broadcast.
“These leftists are demons and we cannot let them hide”
Treatment Rudy said he received for chinavirus:
Symptoms - not breathing well; he was diagnosed with pneumonia; hospitalized
Steroids,
Remdesivir,
Regeneron (called it a miracle drug)
Felt much better in a few days.
Rudy? As a special prosecutor? Hmmm...
Rudy is not healthy to do a full-time job. That was four years ago.
He’s not going to be any Special Counsel as he hasn’t been in the DOJ for decades.
But we can pretend it’s 1988.
Thank you!!!
Am listening today!
Good show so far, Rudy and Cortez made great points!
Not liking what the one guest was saying. He had someone on thats been right about a lot of this and the guy was saying that a judge like roberts will want to pass on this and turn it away. He said it’s gonna be sad. I hope he is wrong. I would think this is right up the SCOTUS alley and a case they should be taking. Eyes of the world watching. Time to step up and do your jobs. He was also saying they may punt it back down and want to hear evidence. Why can’t the SCOTUS hear the evidence.
“Not liking what the one guest was saying.”
Ed Pozzuoli (pronounced Poz-wali)
Bannon called him a Constitutional expert.
Said he has been right about almost everything in the recent past.
...not too optimistic re: Scotus. Texas lawsuit has strong grounds in Constitutional law. The problem is the relief they seek from Scotus...a bridge too far for Scotus.
Did he say what relief they should have asked for?
The impression I got was Texas was just asking them to follow the constitution. How is that a bridge too far?
Better to listen to interview again (as I need to do but can’t now)
My very unreliable impression is that Ed was not faulting the lawsuit so much as he was implying that Scotus will not overturn the electors the offending states have chosen.
He added additional related complications he thinks Scotus will have.
IIRC, he didn’t offer an alternative remedy the Scotus lawsuit should have asked for.
If they would at least kick it back to states legislatures we would still have a chance.
“If they would at least kick it back to states legislatures we would still have a chance.”
? As I understand the complexities, even if Scotus does that, the offending states don’t have the political will to remedy this election fraud and Scotus can’t force them to.
Lawsuits galore will no doubt continue but not in time to save THIS election.
BTW: I am ever optimistic til Scotus and all the fat ladies have sung.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.