[joshua c]

But then Roberts sided with the Liberals in the PA case. His reason:

In the Pennsylvania case, Roberts sided with the liberals. He wrote Monday that he voted the other way in the Wisconsin case because the lower court ruling came from a federal judge, not a state court, as it did in the Pennsylvania case.

Anyone understand this reasoning?

[V_TWIN]

“Anyone understand this reasoning?”

Yeah....he’s in obamas hip pocket...never forget that demon is pulling most of, if not all the strings here.

[nathanbedford]

Chief Justice Roberts is arguing: If state law applies, as crafted by a state legislature, the opinion interpreting that law by the Supreme Court of that state should accorded deference by the federal court.

Our problem in the Texas case will probably be standing.