your understanding is absoutely correct; and, looking at this through the lens of reality, not likely that SCOTUS is going to delay the electors voting on Monday..
If you are the State of Texas and you are alleging that cheating in other states has diluted the votes of your citizens thereby depriving them of their right to equal protection of the law under the Constitution in what venue other than SCOTUS could you be heard?
You could be heard in the offending State’s court.
If you are the State of Texas and you are alleging that cheating in other states has diluted the votes of your citizens thereby depriving them of their right to equal protection of the law under the Constitution in what venue other than SCOTUS could you be heard?
Salient point of this entire discussion...well crafted.
If not SCOTUS...who?
In other words if SCOTUS denies the Texas suit, legal precedence will be set permitting sham ‘elections’ to be conducted... with the Court’s blessing.
I certainly was surprised yesterday to find that Pennsylvania does not impose a ‘mandatory signature verification’ on mail-in ballots.
Anybody else surprised to learn that?
From the beginning of this 2020 election debacle I have asserted the ‘cheaters’ went to those States, Counties, and Cities who had the weakest election laws, regulations, and practices in order to carry out there nefarious deeds.
Below is from the Pennsylvania response to Texas—
“””””First, Texas asserts that the Secretary “abrogated”
the mandatory signature verification requirement for
absentee or mail-in ballots. Bill of Complaint at 14-15.
This is untrue. See In re Nov. 3, 2020 Election, 240 A.3d
591, 610 (Pa. 2020) (Election Code does not authorize
county election boards to reject mail-in ballots based on
an analysis of a voter’s signature. “[A]t no time did the
Code provide for challenges to ballot signatures.”). Far
from usurping any legislative authority, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused “to rewrite a statute in
order to supply terms which [we]re not present
therein.” Id. at 14. A federal judge reached the same
result. See In Donald Trump for President, Inc. v.
Boockvar, 2020 WL 5997680, at *58 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10,
2020) (“[T]he Election Code does not impose a signature-comparison requirement for mail-in and absentee
ballots.”).””””