To clarify, this is going to be statistical, which is
different from mathematical algorithmic evidence of my
previous post. What it shows is a phenomenon the author suggest
to be investigated. If you’ve been following the post,
you’ve already saw evidence that mathematicians can find
algorithm patterns in the data that shouldn’t be there,
Salomon for example - “The precincts seized more than once
were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving
the software takes the first available precinct from an
ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.”
Statistical Evidence of Dominion Election Fraud? Time to Audit the Machines.
https://fraudspotters.com/statistics-about-dominion-election-fraud/
Overview
Statistical analysis of past presidential races supports the view that in 2020, in counties where Dominion Machines were deployed, the voting outcomes were on average (nationwide) 1.5% higher for Joe Biden and 1.5% lower for Donald Trump after adjusting for other demographic and past voting preferences.
FAQ page about this analysis.
https://fraudspotters.com/dominion-effect-faq/
+++!!!