Now that they know the mathematical pattern of election
fraud, the easier it is to see in the data;
A little index for it;
1:30 “Every single time votes came in, if that total got
above 2.1% roughly, what they did is they adjusted it down
by somewhere between 4 and 5 percent.”
1:45 “the third party votes were coming in at higher than 2%
so what they did is they knocked 645 votes off the third
party candidates which is roughly a 5% or 4.8% change” now I
don’t know what happened to those votes but I do know they
are no longer counted for the third party, and it like
they’re basically gone.”
3:15 “the vote total had gotten so fast, it went from 2.1 to
2.9% which is a huge jump, so what you’ll see is the cheating
algorithm essentially we hit 3% and it had a major
correction, brought it right back down to 2.1% again, and
what that did is they stole 13,500 votes from the third
party candidate and that dropped the percentage like they
stole 30%, and that almost a third of what was going to the
third party at that time, just gone.”
3:45 “their strategy here was to keep those votes,that go to
the third party at 2.1%”
4:00 “This happened multiple, multiple times throughout the
evening, until their is one big adjustment which is the
second part of their strategy”
4:30 this was their 2% strategy to keep Biden the candidate,
so what they did is the total number of votes from all
candidates lost is 194,846, that’s a huge number that was
gone at that time,
4:45 “but what they did here was they took roughly 6000
votes from the third party candidate, which is 13% at the
time, they stole 107, votes from Donald Trump at that time
which is approximately 12% of his total votes, but to keep
it looking fair they stole only 81,000 votes from Biden so
that’s only 7% of his total at the time”
5:14 “this is there major adjustment, when the votes are so
out of whack, and so obvious Biden was going to lose, they
just got rid of votes from the different candidates, but at
different ratios so that Biden would come out ahead.”
5:30 “So 81,000 vs 107,000, that almost a 30,000 vote
difference in terms of taken away from one candidate versus
the other, they absolutely stole this from Trump”
5:40 “the big losers are the third party candidates.”
6:04 “they adjusted it a total of 23 times.”
6:09 “but I can prove using these numbers that are publicly
available, that they kept the third party candidate at 2.1%
and would not let it get higher than that”
7:45 “Because there are votes taken from all three
candidates it creates an air of mystery, and so it can’t be
proven either way and this is the smokescreen that they’re
running in order to be easily detected.”
7:58 “the strategy that they went with is the third party
candidates votes were not allowed to get more that 2.1% and
votes were consistently stolen from the third party.”
8:07 “and I think what happened, probably, but I can’t say
for sure, gave those votes to Biden over the course of the evening.”
I must correct at least one of my translations;
7:45 “Because there are votes taken from all three
candidates it creates an air of mystery, and so it can’t be
proven either way and this is the smokescreen that they’re
running in order to be not so easily detected.”
In analysis from other sources I have heard that one ploy used was that Trump votes were flipped to the third party candidate over the time of the counting and that those votes would then flip to Biden later in the count. In this way, they could make it look like the third party person was actually getting more votes which would be less suspicious than just flipping the votes from Trump to Biden directly.
This may explain why the third party votes would increase slowly until they would jump back to the 2% mark - this is the mechanism for re-allocating those votes to Biden.
Seems like the data this person provided would support that theory even though he did not propose it.
bttt