AZLiberty wrote: After FreeQs whipped themselves into a frenzy over TianaHighrider
- - I don't agree and I don't understand what your definition of a frenzy is.
AZLiberty wrote: you’d think they would have learned a lesson about mob behavior
- - I can't see how you can justify your use of the term mob behavior. A troll is a troll and that one wouldn't quit or leave.
AZLiberty wrote: We don’t need no French-style revolution around here, at least not within our FreeQ family.
- - Whew, strong allegations there. Defending the indefensible doesn't reinforce a unified FreeQ family.
Whew, strong allegations there. Defending the indefensible doesn't reinforce a unified FreeQ family. Love you, brother Kalam. Now where's my FreeQ Rule Book?
Ransomnote's rule for trolls is, "Don't feed the trolls." If you keep responding to them -- even if it's to drive them away -- they keep responding to you. Etc.
Only Bagster seems to have the knack of making trolls feel so small they can't even reach the keyboard. So ransomnote's second rule for trolls is, "Let Bagster take care of it."
The third rule for trolls is, "When all else fails, invoke Jim Robinson's rule." He gave us this nice little playground and even put up a protective fence. If someone's disturbing the peace, we can throw them over the fence.
I would suggest a fourth rule: "Give Q thread regulars the benefit of the doubt -- especially about doubt." While we Trust the Plan, there are moments when even FreeQ trust is tested. Each reacts in his or her own way. Let us carry our wounded until they're ready to rejoin the battle.