Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nonlegal factors that SCOTUS justices might have to consider in deliberating Texas's lawsuit
American Thinker ^ | 10 Dec, 2020 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 12/10/2020 4:40:28 AM PST by MtnClimber

Do you think the Democrats regret talking about packing the Supreme Court?

A lot of people were shocked when the Supreme Court agreed to hear the lawsuit by the State of Texas against Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania for allegedly exploiting "the COVID-19 pandemic to justify ignoring federal and state election laws and unlawfully enacting last-minute changes, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election." According to media reports, Louisiana and Alabama A.G.s, and possibly six other states, have expressed interest in joining Texas in the lawsuit.

Many legal scholars dismiss the chances of success for the lawsuit, and even sympathetic observers such as John Hinderaker of Powerline term the suit a "Hail Mary" move, even though it is "plausible from a legal standpoint," because "the likelihood that the Supreme Court will seriously entertain the idea of overturning the apparent result of the election is far-fetched."

I am not a lawyer and will leave to others far more qualified than I to debate the intricacies of constitutional jurisprudence. My concern here is the other factors that may well weigh on the minds of the nine justices of the Supreme Court.

It's been more than a century since the words "[t]he Supreme Court follows the election returns" entered the nation's consciousness, meaning that it is naïve to believe that the Court acts solely on the basis of legal reasoning and precedent. I am looking at the case from the standpoint of the Supreme Court as a political body, one that cloaks its actions in the veneer of legal reasoning but that ultimately is well aware of the political background and consequences of its actions.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: communism; insurrection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: trebb
Good to know we have some patriots here on FR - some of the folks here make one wonder.

I know what you mean.

For now, I'm keeping my powder dry, my eyes and ears open, and I'm topping off my preps.

I saw that you were a 24-year Air Force veteran. I did 20 in the USAF myself. Retired a few years ago. Take care.

61 posted on 12/10/2020 12:13:53 PM PST by SIDENET (ISAIAH 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

Just now saw your response to my post.
So here’s wishing YOU and YOURS
a Merry CHRISTMAS and BLESSED New Year:)!


62 posted on 12/10/2020 2:47:31 PM PST by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Agreed


63 posted on 12/10/2020 7:34:27 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

I retired from uniform in ‘98.
I guess we need our own meme - maybe “Semper Give ‘Em The Gun”
Powder dry, weapons clean and ready and in mood to practice what the Founders wanted us armed for.

God Bless


64 posted on 12/11/2020 4:01:27 AM PST by trebb (Fight like your life and future depends on it - because they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson