Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skr
Self-disenfranchisement should never be the other voters’ problem: if a voter doesn’t follow the rules
on mail-in ballot forms, the voter disenfranchises him/herself alone.
If Election officials ignore the rules
and accept non-compliant ballots, they themselves, disenfranchise all of those who followed the rules.

Nice take.

4 posted on 12/10/2020 4:31:15 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: All

The Texas lawsuit before the USSC argues that PA, GA, MI, and WI violated the Constitution by:
(A) changing election laws, thereby treating voters unequally, and, (B) allowed serious voting irregularities.

A BRILLIANT LEGAL ATTACK: Trump is asking that “every legal vote count,” that the court invalidate illegal votes.

Lower court judges would not hear voter fraud cases, deciding that, if they were to consider
Trump’s claims, they ran the risk of “disenfranchising” Biden voters........a singularly dishonest argument.
Disenfranchisement occurs when people are deprived of the right to vote.

No one was “deprived” of the vote here. So-called Biden “voters” all voted.

No one can disenfranchise a “voter” who was illegal from the get-go, particularly when that “Biden voter” is
<><> dead,
<><> an amorphous computer algorithm,
<><> or a paper form mfg in a Chinese print shop submitted as a voter.


5 posted on 12/10/2020 4:33:10 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson