[Miss Didi]

SCOTUS rejected the Kelly case without any explanation or dissents, probably because, more or less, the same context is covered in the Texas case, but with a wider scope affecting more states.— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 8, 2020

[Metrobank]

So no injunctive relief in PA. What’s next to overcome this obvious fraud of illegal ballots in PA? Anybody have a clue?

[WildHighlander57]

Miss Didi wrote:

“SCOTUS rejected the Kelly case without any explanation or dissents, probably because, more or less, the same context is covered in the Texas case, but with a wider scope affecting more states.— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 8, 2020
“

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1336431772528234499?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Interesting; how often do they just say “no” and don’t add explanations?

[ConjunctionJunction]

In the Pennsylvania case, SCOTUS only denied emergency injunctive relief. The case is still alive (for now).

[Bob Ireland]

***SCOTUS rejected the Kelly case without any explanation or dissents***

With more accurate reporting - for shame, Lou Dobbs - it turns out only the injunctive relief was rejected. Along with the Texas case things are looking up - except the clock.