SCOTUS rejected the Kelly case without any explanation or dissents, probably because, more or less, the same context is covered in the Texas case, but with a wider scope affecting more states.— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 8, 2020
So no injunctive relief in PA. What’s next to overcome this obvious fraud of illegal ballots in PA? Anybody have a clue?
Miss Didi wrote:
“SCOTUS rejected the Kelly case without any explanation or dissents, probably because, more or less, the same context is covered in the Texas case, but with a wider scope affecting more states.— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 8, 2020
“
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1336431772528234499?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Interesting; how often do they just say “no” and don’t add explanations?
In the Pennsylvania case, SCOTUS only denied emergency injunctive relief. The case is still alive (for now).
With more accurate reporting - for shame, Lou Dobbs - it turns out only the injunctive relief was rejected. Along with the Texas case things are looking up - except the clock.