[Larry - Moe and Curly]

“SCOTUS took the case that would change the election results”

Okay - we get to SCOTUS. They’re, at best, going to rule that, yes the elections were unconstitutional, and they’ll refer it back to the state legislatures to appoint the electors.

Is there any chance in heck that there are enough balls in any of the legislatures to go against their states’ “popular vote” and do the right thing? Didn’t we already see this problem pop up in the PA legislature where they wouldn’t throw out the election and take over on their own after being shown the fraud and corruption by Rudy’s team?

[WildHighlander57]

It’s not just Texas; Louisiana has joined, and -possibly- up to 7 others.

IIRC, the Texas case asks for “new electors”, among other things.

[pgkdan]

Is there any chance in heck that there are enough balls in any of the legislatures to go against their states’ “popular vote” and do the right thing? Didn’t we already see this problem pop up in the PA legislature where they wouldn’t throw out the election and take over on their own after being shown the fraud and corruption by Rudy’s team?

I'll bet a paycheck that POTUS still has trump cards to play. A SCOTUS ruling PLUS whatever POTUS has up his sleeve will send these pusillanimous, dishonest and probably bought off legislators scurrying back to their state capitals to send Trump electors so fast all our heads will spin.

[WildHighlander57]

See this Q & A in the Seven States Joined thread:

Question on TX suit, what’s the solution:

Can you tell us what happens if SCOTUS rules in Favor of Texas??

176 posted on 12/8/2020, 7:05:55 PM by Fawn (”My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” Hosea 4:6)

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913549/posts?page=176#176

Answer:

The State Legislatures either send Trump electors or NO Electors

178 posted on 12/8/2020, 7:08:03 PM by BigEdLB (All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913549/posts?page=178#178

Another question:

So, are you saying that they CANNOT send any BIDEN electors?

221 posted on 12/8/2020, 7:27:34 PM by Fawn (”My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” Hosea 4:6)

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913549/posts?page=221#221

And answer:

That is the purpose of the lawsuit. SCOTUS invalidates vote and makes legislatures have a non biden solution

224 posted on 12/8/2020, 7:29:06 PM by BigEdLB (All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913549/posts?page=224#224

[ROCKLOBSTER]

to go against their states’ “popular vote”

The "popular vote" is different from the fraudulent "digital vote". "Popular" would require people.

Computers don't get to elect candidates.