Posted on 12/08/2020 2:07:50 PM PST by ransomnote
That youtube has a celebratory air to it.
#breaking SCOTUS has voted 6-3 to hear the Texas lawsuit— Washington Pundit © (@TWPundit) December 9, 2020
SEVEN states have now joined Texas lawsuit
https://www.citizenfreepress.com ^ | 12.08.2020 | Kane
Posted on 12/8/2020, 7:13:25 PM by rxsid
SEVEN states have now joined Texas lawsuit
Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota and Lousiana…
SEVEN states have now joined Texas lawsuit, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state. @Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota.
#StopTheSteal • #FightForTrump— Ali 🟧 #StopTheSteal (@ali) December 8, 2020
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3913549/posts?page=1
“Prepare to Come About”
************************************************
You left out “Helm’s Alee”...”Come About” (Now, “Man Overboard, Starboard Side”)
🚨🚨🚨
BREAKING: SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS. pic.twitter.com/Dy1BZhIYnN— anonymous patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@anonpatriotq) December 9, 2020
I would suggest “election law” rather than “election rules”. My $0.02 :)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3913547/posts?page=1
President Trump can Stop the Steal by enforcing the Article IV guarantee
Flopping Aces ^ | 12-08-20 | Alec Rawls
“The US Supreme Court denied the application for the injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.”
This was the Sean Parnell and Mike Kelly case.
*********************************************************************************
So this was just for denial of an injunction to prevent certification-nothing about merits of the case.
So the Gov. and SOS of PA can chose to knowingly certify a fraudulent election or not. When they certify, they too will be guilty of fraudulent action. More swamp type critters caught in the sting.
That’s my story and I’m stickin to it.
Trump was ahead by 800,000 votes in PA. Then, after they counted the late votes (all fraud), he was a little behind. Tossing out those votes gives him the state. Wisconsin, Georgia and Michigan had the same issue. Big leads overcome with late ballots.
I don’t think it’s hard to show that the illegal changes affected the outcome.
I agree.
LOLOL. That’s how I think of people who get their news from the MSM.
This is the wrong case. It’s a case filed in November? Republican party of PA vs. PA SOS.
We know it’s coming, could this be how ?
h/t starman417
They are not going to know what hit them. They did not want to teach their kids about the Constitution in the schools. We have a couple of ignorant generations.
Grey_Whiskers wrote:
“SCOTUS took the case that would change the election results”
...PA alone wouldn’t do it.
*************************************
Defiant wrote:
Makes a lot of sense as an explanation.
********************************************************************************
I agree with you guys 188%
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.