Posted on 12/07/2020 3:59:47 AM PST by MtnClimber
Scott Adams has evolved a simple measurement to determine whether the Democrats used fraud to push Biden ahead in the election: Were Democrat vote counters acting as if they were committing election fraud? The answer to that question is “yes.” When you combine that with the law’s acceptance that people’s suspicious conduct is useful evidence to prove that they committed a crime, you’ve got one more legal cudgel against the Democrats.
American criminal law has long recognized suspicious conduct as one link in the chain bringing a criminal to justice. Thus, law officers have the right to act if they reasonably believe someone is behaving suspiciously.
For example, in United States v. Trullo, 809 F.2d 108, 112 (1st Cir. 1987), a case involving cocaine distribution, it was not error to defer to a police officer’s conclusion that the defendant was acting suspiciously when he had a chat with a third party who got into the car, the two drove to a deserted street, and then, after a short chat, the third party got out of the car and walked right back to his starting point. If it looks like a drug deal, that’s sufficient on-the-ground evidence to arrest someone.
The law tracks well with common sense. You don’t need to have extraordinary sensibility or experience to recognize that when someone is desperately hiding an activity, he’s either planning a surprise party for you or he’s engaged in conduct that’s illegal or embarrassing – and I think we can rule out a surprise party at the vote-counting headquarters in the contested states.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
You don’t eject the Republican poll watchers in every one of these states without something being coordinated and we all know it was fraud being coordinated.
That Scott Adams video needs to be shared far and wide at every opportunity.
“The law tracks well with common sense. You don’t need to have extraordinary sensibility or experience to recognize that when someone is desperately hiding an activity...”
You just need law people doing their jobs and not ignoring the obvious for political reasons/butter.
Hillary Clinton and BLM riots come to mind immediately.
When is somebody gonna get arrested? Defund the police if they are going to allow voter fraud on this scale.
They want our support? I guess not.
They should all lose their pensions too. They will under Harris anyway.
COLLUSION
Why hasn’t Spread Eagle Harris given up her senate seat yet? It’s because she knows that the election was stolen and that her and Brain Dead Biden may yet be stopped.
Collusion,
From Sea to Shinning Sea!
Direct link to the one minute Scott Adams video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNM3K0cH2tc&t=1s&ab_channel=TedPikul
Scott Adams: DemSocRat bullies chasing Republican witnesses out of the counting rooms IS THE EVIDENCE of cheating.
[This 1 minute video of Adams plus the counting/cheating rooms. This is a good video to share with your short-attention-span “no evidence” normie friends and family.]
btt
What I mean by this, if you are an honest poll worker, and, at 4:00 in the morning you got a boatload of votes in that were going 92% for Biden, wouldn't you stop and say, "whoa, we need to get Republican observers here, because if we don't they will think that we rigged this"?
I had to quit listening a couple of weeks ago [after listening faithfully since the summer of 2016], because he was straying down the wrong path.
One of his problems is that he doesn't understand the malignancy of hyper-political Democrat administrations, because he's never felt the full effect of becoming "an enemy" of such a pack of official jackals.
He is OK with Obama's presi-duncey, because he was never on the Halfrican's naughty list.
He's going to be on the first page of the Harris-Joek naughty list.
And he's not going to like it.
Scott is now an "election denier".
He's on the Harris-Joek naughty list.
“How would poll workers act if they were honest?”
How would Schiff act?
How would Brennan act?
How would Hillary act?
How would MSM & Fox News act?
How would Twitter, Google, Youtube, Wikipedia & Snopes act?
How would Hitler have acted?
How would Satan act?
Yes and you don’t tape cardboard on the windows so people can’t see what you are doing.
Your corollary is pretty good.
BTTT.
Why didn't they fight?
If it were you, or me, or a bunch of other FReepers, I think the videos would be of fights.
The party about to lose the election by razor thin margins in the 11th hour in several states has asked for protection against vote fraud for decades.
The party about to win the election by razor thin margins in the 11th hour insisted vote fraud was rare, isolated and fought increased protections against fraud.
Whether or not the election is skewed by fraud, anyone unwilling to understand why the aggrieved party is skeptical and frustrated is acting in bad faith.
- Jeremiah MacRoberts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.