He did not audit, it was RISK LIMITING AUDIT. For those who don’t know what that is, basically it is feeding a small sample size through a machine and saying, ok the machines are good!
It shows nothing. Any machine can be chosen and because the changes can be done through a backdoor or flash drive, it proves nothing.
A forensic audit will tell, as will confiscated flash drives.
It shows nothing. Any machine can be chosen and because the changes can be done through a backdoor or flash drive, it proves nothing.
A forensic audit will tell, as will confiscated flash drives.
That simply isn't true. So many of us are now the victims of disinformation. It is the reason I post on this particular matter at all.
All that was required was a statistical sample size, but that is not what was ordered by Raffensperger. 100% of the ballots where hand counted, and not through a machine. Why would you dispute that?
What are we capable of being convinced of? Only lies? Really, we need to watch ourselves.