Posted on 12/05/2020 4:36:26 AM PST by MtnClimber
The facts suggest otherwise, including a huge vote spike at the same time the secret count took place and the suspicious behavior of two of the workers.
Immediately after the story broke about the video showing workers at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta counting ballots after poll observers had apparently been asked to leave, a purported news site sprang into action to “fact check” the report. While the "fact check" gave room to Democrat operatives to cover their derrieres, the counter-narrative was ludicrous. Additionally, new evidence about vote spikes and two of the vote counters behaving suspiciously gave even more credence to Republicans' take on the surveillance video.
The video that galvanized so many people showed a large room in which poll observers were completely cordoned off from any meaningful observation. Shortly before 10:00 p.m., one of the poll workers – a black woman with eye-catching long, blond braids, approached the observers and, not long after that, with apparent reluctance, the observers filed away, vacating the room a little before 11 p.m.
At 11:00, with the room ostensibly shut down and the observers gone, the remaining poll workers suddenly sprang into action, dragging rolling suitcases out from under a table. They took ballots out of those suitcases and spent the next two hours scanning them, at a rate of about 3,000 ballots per hour per scanner.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Accom[plice to TREASON. China bought him, now he is a traitor.
well whatever is going on along those lines, it seems to be working very well in california.
it makes me want to be like a duck, tranquil on the surface, paddling like crazy below the surface, trying to figure out how to get mobile on short notice.
:(
Hi Liz -
The Secretary of State legally certified election results on or about November 20, when there was evidence of illegal voting and breaking of the law by election workers so as to undermine the integrity of the results. One would think that prior to certification the SOS would address these activities illegal prior to certification so that his certification would not be false. Now even more significant evidence (video) has emerged that substantiates and expands on the original claims of a fraudulent election. IOW, the SOS certification is a lie. If you signed something that had legal significance that was not true, you would be in legal jeopardy. While we need to be careful to jail elected officials in such circumstances because he cannot know every detail, but he cannot turn a blind eye to the illegal activity before or after his certification - else the election is a farce and the corruption will continue, or maybe get worse. Some perps need to be walked. SOS might not be able to de-certify, which means another GA branch of government may be responsible for correcting this great injustice.
Watch your six, patriot.
OK got it, Sunday then.
Ruby is guilty of sedition. She is not likely smart enough to realize how much danger she is in ... demon rats/see eye ay do not like loose ends and Ruby and her daughter are very loose ends.
how did he get this information?
btt
So were the “ Army of Black Sleezballs “ hired to work at these polling places. Seems ALLOT of these people are black and they had to know what was going down.
Why is Ruby processing absentee ballots that have no return address by herself in an isolated cubicle?
“They were afraid even a democrat observer may have a heart and step forward.”
The first thing is to establish if there were kkkrap observers, then we can address the next questions. After all, if “yes”, they weren’t their when the after hours counting occurred. Then they would either corroborate the GOP observers statements, or ..... And if “no”, then one should ask why not? What was the party affiliation of every paid “worker” and how many are active in their party?
Ruby and daughter are probably lawyered up by now.
Since there seems to be no limit to the federal government, election fraud in conducting a federal election surely exists. Calling Bill Barr.
“is it too much to ask for journalists who are on our side...”
Go to EpochTimes website. https://www.theepochtimes.com/
the impression i continue to receive from legal circles at a distance (i am not a lawyer and do not have any personal insights into the profession) is that the judiciary has deliberately constructed case law so as to bias it against interference in elections citing the separation of powers considerations.
most of the focus in the past has been on smaller cases involving relatively low level vote fraud.
what we are seeing currently is relatively high level electoral fraud, which can be briefly described as vote fraud on an industrial scale, eg RICO level fraud.
the courts having been rigged only for deflecting (small scale) vote fraud, are getting hamstrung by the more recent appearance of electoral fraud.
the archetypical situation is that a plaintiff attempting to gain standing to sue claims injury in the thousands of votes. the defense responds with the now-classical argument that there is no injury since thousands of votes is not sufficient to change outcome at a state or national level. the judge consults case law which is filled with motions to deny standing and dismiss due to a multitude of prior cases involving small scale vote fraud (in contrast to electoral fraud). the judge then grants motions to dismiss based on lack of standing and case law involving vote fraud (but not electoral fraud, which is conflated with vote fraud, which might be considered by some to be an omission of convenience for defense and judges).
it seems at a casual glance from my bleachers seat that election law is very complex and specialized. electoral fraud law is even more complex and specialized, and case law on electoral fraud is spotty, making litigation and predictions very difficult. one practical result is that in order to obtain standing, plaintiff lawyers are immediately confronted with the task of performing legal gymnastics to avoid immediate and near certain dismissal at the initial pleadings stages. they all need to be appellate level elections fraud lawyers to proceed with confidence. the number of appellate level elections fraud lawyers must be very few and far between. some of them now sit on the USSC and other courts, which robs the field of legal talent, leaving non-specialists to fill the breach. in reality, practicing law under such circumstances can be a crapshoot and there are pitfalls no matter which initial direction is chosen due to elasticity in which case law can be applied by both lower level and upper level courts.
i would welcome any corrections, additions, etc. it would be a luxury for me to sit down and write a thoroughly researched answer (and it would still be a layman’s perspective, unauthoritative and very possibly very inaccurate).
They THINK this is ok. Why wouldn’t they think that? Their thinking needs to change. Our rulers have no respect for us nor fear of us. It looks like it is time to change that.
Bagpipes billy barr can’t hear his phone, the squeal of his pipes is drowning it out. Barr has proven himself to be deep state.
He analyzes data for a living.
“Standing”
Critical to get one’s case before the judge. The left has had no problem getting standing on all sorts of issues, small and significant, when one would have expected a court to reject many of their cases on standing alone. Those cases would need to be studied so established precedence can be used to address the challenge to standing. Unfortunately, by the time one successfully appeals a standing issue in an election case, and it will become moot since the election will be over. We are in an area of law where there appears to be no judicial remedy for a legal injury.
Separation of powers may be the correct and only avenue, but herding cats seems to be an easier exercise.
If their justification is true, why not just show the earlier video to prove it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.