granted some of the democratic leadership is corrupt. if not the leadership, then the effective leadership consisting of the guys behind the curtain.
a proposal such as this could have many minor variants. however, a proposal such as this would get nowhere unless the democrats are willing as a political unit to take the first step of recognizing that a problem exists. perhaps that is the point of these hearings, to help America and in particular the democrat voting public (who i model as not having been a party to the cheating) come to the realization that cheating occurred and that it is immoral to benefit from any such cheating.
if the democratic voting public does not come to that realization then the remainder of the proposal falls on deaf ears and would get nowhere (of course).
it seems rational to explain an existing unanticipated problem to a person and to suggest that the person can help with the solution the problem with a bit of extra work. this is in a sense goodwill or civility. the usa was built on goodwill and civility. now we will get to see if we still have these qualities.
It’s simply unconstitutional. The courts, SCOTUS in particular, can only rule that the state legislatures need to do their job as prescribed in Article II of the Constitution. Your idea is never going to be used, nor would it solve the problem.