Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rintintin

The democrat party, under the guise of COVID, sent out millions of unsolicited mail-in ballots.

Whether those ballots were returned or not, the Rats strategically manufactured millions more ballots with no post mark, no signature, no address etc. The ballots were delivered in the dead of night while no one was looking. The ballot was placed into the Joe Biden column and then the envelope destroyed, leaving no trace of chain of custody.

This is why the Rats were preventing observers from inspecting the ballot envelopes. Theft in plain site. A recount would just be counting the same invalid ballots.

Now how can any impartial judge call this a fair and honest election?

If the Supreme Court does not nullify the vote results from the six contested states then elections from this day forward will be forever meaningless.


19 posted on 11/29/2020 2:02:10 PM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Flavious_Maximus

Please see my post at 26.


27 posted on 11/29/2020 2:28:38 PM PST by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Flavious_Maximus

This is why there’s paper ballots and envelopes

Signature matching

Without that any ballot not from in person on election 🗳 day is null and void

That is the law and there’s of course several other laws

So really only one question must be answered - do we have election laws or do we not?

The Democrats are really going to have to greatly expand their double standard if they’re trying to try to include millions of people who committed fraud


29 posted on 11/29/2020 2:33:06 PM PST by Truthoverpower (The guv-mint you get is the Trump winning express ! Yea haw ! Trump Pence II! Save America again )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Flavious_Maximus

The taking outthe observers was the Dems’ ultimate tactic to hide their fraudulent ballot count. The only way the chain of custody of the ballots could be authenticated was be close inspection of the mailing envelope’s signature before the ballot was removed. How that signature was compared to the one on file was important. That comparison method most likely was done by machine. A testing of the signature comparison machine had to be done before the signature verification process was done. Somewhere I read that the signature comparison machine could be fixed for percentage of sensitivity. That way forged signatures could pass if the sensitivity was lowered.

Tabulators and signature verification machines should be inspected to learn if any backdoor functions could be accessed remotely. That would be needed to be done by a computer tech specialist from Goldman Sachs International Audit Firm or PricewaterhouseCoopers.


36 posted on 11/29/2020 2:44:55 PM PST by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Flavious_Maximus
for all you smart people out there, can the SC NOT say that the election was a total fraud?...how can they not stop the fraud...

its right there, in front of them....all avenues of proof....

38 posted on 11/29/2020 2:48:17 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson