That link is to US Attorneys - and doesn’t speak of “federal district” - I guess that’s up to interpretation by the individual. I was just curious when I read it as I’d never heard anything referred to that way before but it did reinforce my thinking that it’s all judicial related..-not anything the federal government regulates.
As to US Attorneys, in my book they are about as useless as Inspectors General in all the agencies in DC...They always remind me of the old TV commercials - don’t see them anymore - where a bank guard or pest control salesman says in effect “I don’t actually do anything. I’m just here to observe.”
That’s what US Attorneys are. They investigate, write reports and disappear from the scene until they’re needed the next time to investigate and write a report. NOTHING ever happens to correct what they were investigating. But they get a paycheck for investigating and writing that report...Horowitz was the IG for what agency (?) - and did we ever get any resolution after his work - I think it was regarding the FBI and the Russian flap? Nope - got the report tho’....
I remember the US Attorney who prosecuted Scooter Libby falsely; in that case something WAS done even if it was wrong, and the one in Sacramento (Walpin) who actually did do his job and got fired as it involved a friend of obozo and that flake with the funny sounding name in the Southern District of NY..the one Trump fired - rightly so...
That’s it - just curiosity that prompted my question.