Fact Check: Pennsylvania Did Not Tally More Mail-in Votes In The Presidential Election Than Actual Ballots Received: The 1,823,148 number appears to be the number of mail-in ballots requested for the June 2, 2020 primary election in Pennsylvania

Lead Stories ^ | 11/27/2020 | Olivera Perkins

[semimojo]

We’ve been post-principle here for some years. We’re now post-fact.

Thanks anyway for the information.

[Texas Eagle]

So-o-o-o-o-o-o, President Trump beat Sleepy Joe in the Primary?

[Texas Eagle]

Every County in PA is called Adams County?

[SeekAndFind]

Here's the additional information provided by SNOPES

[EXCERPT]

The 1.8 million figure represents the number of mail-in ballots that Pennsylvania reported had been requested by persons registered as Democrats as of the voter registration deadline of Oct. 19. That figure did not include the hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots that were also requested by persons registered as Republicans (or persons registered with third parties affiliations or with no party affiliation) as of that date:

The deadline for requesting mail-in ballots was several days later (Oct. 27), and by then
over 3 million mail-in ballots were requested, of which over 2.6 million were ultimately returned by the specified deadline for ballot counting:

The numbers reiterated by Trump and his supporters in an attempt to prove election fraud in Pennsylvania bore no relationship to the total of mail-in votes recorded in that state and were not proof of any type of malfeasance or major error in vote-counting.
[END EXCERPT]

[sunny bonobo]

All these tick tock booms sure are turning out to be duds. Who’s working for our side, Inspector Clouseau?

[Hostage]

This is the spin carried by the traitors and their useful idiots (sorry).

The 1.8 million was mailed out for BOTH THE PRIMARY AND THEN AGAIN FOR THE GENERAL.

The primary data is available for view as is all PA data but the data for the general has been locked up. Obviously, PA government does not want public viewing data that is under investigation.

Giuliani has the goods on these people. Don’t worry, he knows what he’s doing.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Thanks anyway for the information.

Yes, There were a lot of voter fraud going on in PA. But it does our side no good to keep citing wrong information. That’s why I started this thread, to get the facts right.

[Jane Long]

👍🏼👍🏼

Agree.

[LegendHasIt]

It has become quite obvious that these days, any person or group who calls themselves "Fact Checkers" are not interested in presenting the truth, but are "checking" the facts: as in the second definition of verb (used with object):

2: to restrain; hold in restraint or control.

[smokingfrog]

Trump gets twice as many votes as Biden on Election Day, but Joe’s mail in vote count is four times higher than Donald’s?
The odds on that happening are pretty much nil.

[calenel]

Regardless of what SNOPES says about this particular item, true or false, SNOPES is a tainted source of truth. I would not use them for anything, even if they are accurate in a particular instance.

[BigEdLB]

How is the number of mail ballots requested a state secret? What is the crooked governor hiding?

[libh8er]

Snopes is a left wing activist site disguised as fact checker.

[rfp1234]

If the Soroscrats know how to backdate ballot receipt dates, and how to create phony pristine ballots, they certainly know how to fudge any other data to match the numbers they want us rubes to believe.

Onward to the SCOTUS.

[DesertRhino]

Snopes is democrat.

[Leaning Right]

> SNOPES is a tainted source of truth <

Right, cal. I only use Snopes as a source of amusement. If a news story makes a liberal look bad, they will twist and turn to make that liberal look good.

And if a news story makes a conservative look good, they will twist and turn to make that conservative look bad.

[Hostage]

If you navigate over to Open Data PA, you can get a list of data sets. On the list you will find Pronary elelction data and click on it. Then you can view all the 1.8 million or so data lines in pages of 100 each and you can export it to a csv file etc.

Then you go back and scroll down the datasets list and you come to the General Election Data and you try to open it and it says you don’t have permission to access it. It’s the only one out of the entire list with that lockup status.

And it’s not because things are getting tidied up for publication or something because you read about the primary data and it was updated as it came in, it was always open for viewing.

So what’s happening now is the Left is attacking Giuliani saying he’s stupid because his claim about overcounting came from the primary data. No, it did not. Giuliani has the eaw general election data. He’s not stupid. He’s actually brilliant.

[rainee]

All eyes on Justice Alito, right?

[windsorknot]

Snopes is for dopes. Some “fact-checkers” need fact-checking.