[yesthatjallen]

And remember when some computer geeks said they found "anomalies" in voting, the media ran with the story for weeks.

Now they tell us there's so little voter fraud it doesn't affect the outcome.

[sima_yi]

Now they tell us there's so little voter fraud it doesn't affect the outcome.

First, it was "There is no voter fraud."
Then it became "There is no widespread voter fraud."
Then it became "There is no widespread massive voter fraud."
Now it's "There is no widespread massive voter fraud big enough to affect the outcome."

[Vlad0]

1. Why should anyone trust votes counted by a "black box" voting machine? (like Dominion, or any others)

2. "Voting observers" can only see people putting paper ballots into counting machines. They have no idea what the machines are doing with them, because that work is being done by software running on the machine.

3. Essentially "voting observers" might catch some obvious cheating like throwing out paper votes, but cannot catch the potentially much larger and ubiquitous cheating in the software.

4. Let's see the source code. Let's verify that the source code, when compiled, results in the object and executable code that was actually run on the machines.

5. Source code is almost always kept in some sort of "version control system" - those need to be impounded and imaged (duplicated) ASAP.

LET US SEE THE PLACE WHERE THE MAGIC HAPPENS!