[Wilhelm Tell]

The bill has to have some security-undermining features hidden somewhere in the fine print, for the Democrats to have passed it.

[Eagle Forgotten]

I haven't read the bill. Note, however, that the stated Republican objection wasn't to something in the fine print. It was, instead, to pooh-pooh the whole idea that voting machines might be hacked.

[Yardstick]

The Dominion system uses paper ballots, doesn’t it? Wondering if this legislation would have pushed the states into adopting the Dominion systems.

[liberalh8ter]

If memory serves me, (and I admit that it’s not what it once was) the GOP rejected the election security bill because it did not address voter I.D., had mandatory mail-in (permanent) and nationwide ballot harvesting. As with everything cooked up by the Demon rats, it was anything BUT the title of the bill.

[Hostage]

Exactly.

And the facts that nearly every House Republican voted against it and that the Senate Majority Leader would not let it come up for a vote are telltale signs that the details smelled to high heaven.