Replies

On the remedy, she is asking for all. sometimes a plaintiff will ask for one thing, or in the alternative another. On a quick scan, none of the remedy parts is that sort of choice. All of them could be ordered and there would be no overlap or conflict.

Thanks for clarifying.

In the Prayer for Relief part (p. 70) she does have an “alternatively” section:

“Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order instructing Defendants to decertify the results of the General Election for the Office of President.

208.
Alternatively, Plaintiffs seek an order instructing the Defendants to certify the results of the General Election for Office of the President in favor of President Donald Trump.

209.
In the alternative, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order prohibiting Defendants from including in any certified results from the General Election the tabulation of absentee and mailing ballots which do not comply with the Michigan Election Code...”

Per the above, either she wants the results decertified OR she wants them certified for Trump + the illegal absentee and mail-in ballots thrown out? Is she saying they would need to throw those ballots out in order to certify for Trump?

In any case, her longer list of remedies follows this part. Would that make these paragraphs moot?

"On the remedy, she is asking for all. sometimes a plaintiff will ask for one thing, or in the alternative another. On a quick scan, none of the remedy parts is that sort of choice. All of them could be ordered and there would be no overlap or conflict."

OTOH this spaghetti throw is a little messier than PA or GA; one surmises the hook might be baited enough for the judge to latch onto 2 or 3 and demand Amended. Which is fine.