You fail to see how the court is the check to the election process in our Constitutional Republic. You are looking for the court, a check in the process, to decide what the outcome is. The court’s role is quite clear in the Constitution. The Court can’t do anything but determine whether the election was fair and honest. If the election has been decided to be compromised or contested, then process reverts back to the legislators of the state to make a decision on who the Electors are. Or in other cases (e.g. State Senator, Representative etc.). The Courts cannot say or determine any other ruling than either the election was fair and honest or it was not. To expect the Court to decide anything else shows ignorance of the checks and balances of which was set forth by our Founding Fathers.
And for the last time, it is not for the courts to decide who the winner of an election is or is not. That responsibility is up to the constituents and lastly the legislature. You might try reading Sidney Powell’s complaint filed in Michigan.
You have referred me to Sidney's filing, but I had already in part read it, I therefore refer you back to what I wrote, which maybe is what you failed at - that is, reading it :-)
Happy Thanksgiving and this appears to be an exchange into which I will fail at investing more time.