I read it. But having NOT read other filings in the past, I can’t put into context the strength or potential effectiveness of the filing. That’s what I look to you folks for.
This is why they cite existing case law history. They use that so that in court you don’t re argue something decided in court previously. And that is why scotus is such a big deal, law of the land. Their ruling sets national precedent. The Cuomo ruling by scotus yesterday for example applies to the entire country, not just New York.
A couple of observations re Sidney Powell’s filing and Lin Wood’s filing.
1. Sydney Powell referred to many of the affidavits in Lin Wood’s complaint.
2. Sidney Powell gave more details about Dominion and Smartmatic than did Wood.
3. Sidney Powell discussed the state law regarding absentee ballots can only be opened and counted on Election Day. Wood did not mention this.
4. Sidney Powell noted that of the more than 1.3 million ABSENTEE VOTER APPICATIONS, only 30 of those 1.3 million ABSENTEE VOTER APPICATIONS were rejected. Wood did not mention this as he probably did not have this data when he filed his complaint on Nov 13.
On balance there was a lot of similarities in the two complaints.