The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a
simple audit to reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes.
First, the system’s central accumulator does not include a protected real-time
audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election
events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs. Essentially
this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify,
or remove log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not
reflect actual voting tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the
actual votes of or the will of the people. (See Hursti August 2019 Declaration,
attached hereto as Exh. 4, at pars. 45-48; and attached hereto, as Exh. 4B,
October 2019 Declaration in Document 959-4, at p. 18, par. 28).
So “the Dominion software does not permit a simple audit” of what the programs actually did with the votes on election night?
Why the hell not???!!!
Disqualifier right there. Any election results that cannot be audited must be declared invalid... It would be like if all the ballots had been shredded. (They probably already did that, too.)
“the system’s central accumulator does not include a protected real-time
audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election
events”
Of course not, that was by design IMO. No chain of custody which makes it totally unreliable. Why would anyone allow these machines to be used other than wanting to deliberately manipulate the vote count.