To: JoSixChip
It’s frustrating that nobody - not the campaign, not Bannon, nobody - seems to be creating a clear list of brief bullet points with precise, quantifiable claims of fraud, such as this claim about missing data sticks, or the claim that many more Mail ballots came in than were sent out. I listened to Bannon today and he is long on rhetoric and generalities, short on the quantifiable specifics.
22 posted on
11/25/2020 6:17:10 PM PST by
rintintin
(If you watch Tucker, you help fund Chris Wallace. No more Fox - period.)
To: rintintin
Agreed. Anyone attempting to follow this event has to skip around for information or watch a 45 minute video on youtube. It’s all a bit overwhelming and can be tiresome.
To: rintintin
They will produce all the evidence in court, where thy are supposed to be produced at, not to CNN or MSNBC.
I don't remember any major case where the media keep insisting that all the evidence be shown to them before the trial (so they can distort and dismiss it and still claim "there is no evidence").
The media has exactly nothing to do with how the case is judged. Ultimately, it will be up to the SCOTUS.
Meanwhile, there is a vast trove of evidence in the public domain for any serious media outlet to find.
OAN had been doing an excellent series on the massive ballot fraud that took place.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson