Uh huh. Some one needs to tell my patients who keep getting infected by people before they become symptomatic.
Clearly there has been a rush to judgment and a rush to manufacture (and profit from) vaccines.
Driven by massive political force from many directions.
Some days it feels like I’m trapped inside the old logic puzzle with the two groups, one lies and the other always tells the truth...
Seven relatives, all direct hospital employees or immediate family, except my brother who was an inpatient just after brain tumor surgery.
Three of them went to ICU.
Two came out OK, my brother did not survive.
I disagree with these Findings. I don’t see my husband during the week. He came down sick on a Thursday, got tested the next Wednesday, I even drove him to urgent care for the test. I never caught the virus. I think it’s due to the fact that I was not around him in the days before symptoms and the couple days after they started. This would coincide with what i read last week about when the most infectious time of this virus is. Now that’s only one example yes but I wanted to share.
Yeah. That ain’t happening. They’ve been exposed they just don’t know who wasn’t smart enough to stay home
And there are a lot of qualifiers in just that small excerpt of that academic study, such as "may be," "were more likely to," "might," "were unlikely to," "they may tend to," etc.
Very roughly speaking, younger people don't need to be overly cautious. But if you're talking about an elderly person or someone with one or more specific preexisting conditions, then it's better to play it safe and not totally rely on all those "may be's" and "more likely to's," while also factoring in the consideration that you want those people to still enjoy life, too. In that case, there are no easy answers.