Not to be a "Debbie Downer", but this language does not instill confidence in what is about to be presented. From the rhetoric they've been providing the last few weeks, the evidence will be so overwhelming and damning, to refute it would be as ludicrous as excitedly voting for a dementia-ridden dumbass and a commie slut from CA.
“...the evidence will be so overwhelming and damning...”
Strange of you to think that that type evidence can be disputed. Look at the hundreds of thousands of bogus mail-in ballots that were counted, in secret, unlawfully. It is not being disputed, just ignored, and Republicans clamor for evidence like it never happened.