Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
I actually was not wanting to get into a discussion about semantics or perception.   A person could easily be labeled a “right-wing oligarch” without fitting your perception of what that would be.

I personally believe the common perception of left-wing as communist and right-wing as fascist is wrong.   There is no difference at all. With the ultra-left and the ultra- right looping around to meet each other. A Communist declares socialism in the name of the "people" and the Fascist declares socialism in the name of the "nation state", with no difference at all in the implementation.

Just as the Council on Foreign Relations has full participation of so called Republicans and Democrats creating a vast un-American uniparty striving for an elite New World Order.

It is difficult to pin down the manifestation but if Soros is a “left-wing oligarch” then a “right-wing oligarch” would be the opposite, yet acting identically.

A true Patriot and Constitutionalist is right in the middle denying the left and the right as either one is Un-American.

55 posted on 11/24/2020 5:42:12 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: higgmeister
You’re correct about there being no difference between the left wing and fascism. Fascism is obviously of the left. Putting them on the right is one of the left’s big lies. Take note of these quotes from Mussolini:
“God does not exist. Religion in science is an absurdity, in practice an immorality and in men a disease.” (1924)

“Fascism entirely agrees with Mr. (John) Maynard Keynes, despite the latter’s prominent position as a Liberal. In fact, Mr. Keynes’ excellent little book, The End of Laissez-Faire, might, so far as it goes, serve as a useful introduction to fascist economics. There is scarcely anything to object to in it and there is much to applaud.” (1928)

“Italy is not a capitalist country according to the meaning now conventionally assigned to that term.” (1933)

“It is no longer economy aiming at individual profit, but economy concerned with collective interest.” (1935)

“Fascism establishes the real equality of individuals before the nation… the object of the regime in the economic field is to ensure higher social justice for the whole of the Italian people… What does ‘social justice’ mean? It means work guaranteed, fair wages, decent homes; it means the possibility of continuous evolution and improvement. Nor is this enough. It means that the workers must enter more and more intimately into the productive process and share its necessary discipline… As the past century was the century of capitalist power, the twentieth century is the century of power and glory of labor.” (1935)

“When the war is over, in the world’s social revolution that will be followed by a more equitable distribution of the earth’s riches, due account must be kept of the sacrifices and of the discipline maintained by the Italian workers. The Fascist revolution will make another decisive step to shorten social distances.” (1941)
The same obviously applies to national socialism, with Goebbels once openly declaring that the Nazi Party “are the German left; we despise bourgeois nationalism”.
57 posted on 11/24/2020 6:41:52 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson