No different here.. Call me a grammar nazi, but that's unprofessional. He has been reversed on appeal and chastised by the Third Circuit, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen again.
************
I have no legal background but found it very odd to find a statement like this in Brann's decision, especially in view of the gravity of the matter before him and the fact that it pertains to the president of the United States:
"This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together from two distinct theories in an attempt to avoid controlling precedent."
I've done a lot of writing in my career but would never have written anything like that. It seems dismissive, sarcastic and unprofessional to me.