Replies

I check KD's page occasionally and found this to be pretty interesting, and in the article is a link to this:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/20/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-tests-unreliable-quarantines-unlawful/

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful” Important legal decision faces total media blackout in Western world

then in todays article there is this link:

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603

However, in an article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, Bullard et al reported that patients could not be contagious with Ct >25 as the virus is not detected in culture above this value

And I read a long article out of Germany last week detailing the same FRAUDULENT way we are testing for the ChiCom Flu, the PCR Test and it's inventor both claim that it is wholly unreliable for Diagnostic Purposes.

So WTF are we doing this for??

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful” Important legal decision faces total media blackout in Western world

Even the New York Times covered PCR testing inaccuracy back in August:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

“The C.D.C.’s own calculations suggest that it is extremely difficult to detect any live virus in a sample above a threshold of 33 cycles. Officials at some state labs said the C.D.C. had not asked them to note threshold values or to share them with contact-tracing organizations.”

The issue is that the majority of the populace is near-retarded, and completely unable to look up facts on their own. A PCR test isn't designed to confirm an infection, it's designed to figure out what the infection is, when you come in with generic symptoms.

(Yes, the original purpose was to speed DNA replication for research, but the big practical application is finding the unknown, not confirming what you think is there.)