Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706

And i have the returned mail list from Delaware county and right now there are 25,000 votes more than returned mail in ballots. Could just be the 25,000 that came in after 10/31 the date of the report. but i am checking and building a database now.


18 posted on 11/23/2020 6:03:18 AM PST by kvanbrunt2 (spooks won on day 76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kvanbrunt2
What slays me is the Left/media's predictable retreat to claiming such things as insignificant or unimportant unless an accuser (even a blind man that's only "seen" the elephant from one viewpoint and simply reports what he saw) has demonstrated tampering that would have "changed the result," all such accusations are to be dismissed and we should "move on, nothing to see here."

Hell no! Such cover only exacerbates the problem for subsequent elections and never roots out any bad guys. In how many elections have Philadelphia precincts shown more votes than registered voters? AFAIK, it never has be rectified! With such reliably repeated under-the-rug-sweeping, election fraudsters surely by this time have become so skilled at their election tampering that they can easily clone it to show any number of desired votes in any Pennsylvanian county.

The media thereby effectively throw the burden of proof back onto all accusers. The media's tactics would in the case of multiple, separate (even coordinated) tamperings appear to make it the whistle blowing observer's responsibility to prove the entire combination of frauds to reach the criterion over "overturning the election." What a wonderful way to make it easier for criminals while literally battling against justice and sleuths! How they laugh when calling citizen detectives "conspiracy theorists."

Using the media/Left criteria, if Rudy, Lin or Sidney don't have they entire picture, "dey gots bupkis!"

If tampering has been shown, the goal of influencing the election may always be assumed. Why else do it? Whether the criminal(s) were successful so as to overthrow the result is merely to be found along the spectrum of their skills, not ON-of-OFF, whether the crime occurred. But no, the Mockingbird media have so effectively trained us! "We must first have proof that it would have 'overturned the election."   Ptui!

It's this set of circumstances that have combined to lower Americans' trust in their election system. It's (stereotypically) the street-guy that lets his vote be traded for a pack of cigarettes that gets caught while the DVSs, Soros, and Eric Coomers of the world are left, election after election, to multiply the size of their election frauds using the pieces of silver from previous crimes.

27 posted on 11/23/2020 6:46:40 AM PST by rx (Truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson