I diasagree with the author about leftist morality. Their sense of right and wrong seems flipped backward. This kind of fraud will be seen as guaranteeing the correct outcome or just a conspiracy theory where there will never be enough proof. I do agree that the left has much to lose due to criminal penalties and first term crimes that caused dems to attempt to destroy General Flynn.
Like Clockwork Orangemanbadazz.
How many empires is Donald J. Trump fighting?
Greatest President Ever.
bookmark
“Many of us on the right would call the left’s moral certainty “self-righteousness.” But let us proceed for the time being with the assumption, for argument’s sake, that we can call it simply righteousness, as in the compelling belief in the rightness of one’s beliefs. So powerful is the left’s righteousness that leftists win many arguments simply by rhetorical force.”
In my estimation the above statement is BS, Pelosi, Biden, Schumer, Harris, Sanders et al, call themselves liberal, while in reality they are agents of communism.
Rep DR Mark Green, Tennessee
Mark Green Blasts Democrats for COVID-19 Hypocrisy
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/11/23/mark-green-blasts-democrats-for-covid-19-hypocrisy/?fbclid=IwAR0X1ecaD8HjPXzyHQJCYRgn4dmKhnTaNA-5xs9UNv3LguosUPPhsMw8oRM
Reminder common colds, flu CO/VID ARE ALL SAME VIRUS, TEST DOESN’T KNOW DIFFERENCE. RUSH TO GET FLU VACCINE WILL HAVE VIRUS IN YOUR BODY, SO HIGH RISK ARW BEING COUNTED AS COVID.
They will resort to all sorts of complicated conspiracy theories rather than admit their view of the universe is wrong.
But there are a significant number of leftists-lite which will be outraged they have been fooled for so long.
Therein lies the danger to leftist-media power.
The flaw in your thinking professor, is that you assume Liberals (not hardcore Leftist radicals but comfortable upper middle class suburban Liberals) will ever admit that this election was stolen through massive fraud.
They won’t.
There will be no moral reckoning in their minds because they will simply close their minds to any evidence put before them if that evidence runs contrary to them getting what they want. They often do this......posture about a subject then drop it like a hot potato the second it becomes politically inconvenient for them.