There are about 10 posts on it in the past hour.
Nobody really knows for sure. I think most likely they just needed to clarify that they are not the same legal teams ... one pursuing corruption, one pursuing an election for a candidate. Maybe they feel Sidney's claims have gone a little too far, either because no evidence yet, or because it's just a different direction from Trump's specific election cases and quite frankly she may be uncovering Republican corruption too.
If you want 4 trillion other interpretations ... have a look at the other threads. There is no shortage of people who are confused or who claim to know the answer or who claim it's all over and we're all gonna die or that it's 187D chess :-)
The tweet by a bona-fide member of the Trump campaign’s legal team has taken over the news. Right before Michigan and PA are scheduled to certify the vote.
Yes, that chess thing especially 😆
Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner.