But But But, all the murderous domestic terrorists in the crowd were really trying to do was ‘take his gun away so that he couldn’t hurt anyone’
Yep- that is the lame argument being made by the left-
First- they had no right to take his gun away-
Second, he had been fired at while an angry mob of domestic terrorists were chasing him down the road
Third- that angry mob of domestic terrorists was also armed and they raised their guns towards him, and lunged for his gun- which they had No right to do- it wasn’t their property- it was his- You don’t get to steal people’s property just because you don’t like what their property is
Had the angry domestic terrorist mob not chased him- none of this woudl have happened- Had they not tried to violate his rights, by threatening his life, and trying to steal his property, while they themselves were armed- none of it woudl have happened-
The left don’t get to say “Well, he shouldn’t have been there armed in the first place”
He had every right to be-
Some will then say “It wasn’t wise for him to be even if he was allowed to be”
Really? When do good hard working citizens begin to stand up? Are they required to all find a hidey hole while domestic terrorists ruin their cities store,s vehicles, homes, and while they attack hard working citizens whom they don’t like?
Domestic terrorists had been terrorizing our cities and towns and hard working citizens for nearly a year by that point- Someone finally had the guts to stand up to them and declare “NO MORE!”
Sadly the domestic terrorists made a piss poor decision that night, and it had to end the way it did- A Kid running for his life- tripping, and being forced to fire on ARMED domestic terrorists who were chasing him down, as a rabid frenzied mob, with intentions to kill him-
The kid had literally just put out a dumpster fire the ABR (AntiFa/BLM/RevCom) types had started, is part of why he was being attacked. So he was clearly a threat to public safety. < /s>
It's time.