'Trump will be proven the winner': Campaign releases statement on Wisconsin recount "The Wisconsin Elections Commission has repeatedly failed to follow the law. "

Just the News ^ | 11/20/2020 | Joseph Curl

[Signalman]

The Trump campaign, which has filed a petition for a statewide recount in Wisconsin, said Friday that when all legal ballots are counted – and illegal votes thrown out – Trump "will be proven the winner.”

“Our democracy depends on fair and impartial elections that fully adhere to the Constitution and state statute," Jim Troupis, Wisconsin counsel to the campaign, said in a statement.

"By staging a last minute attempt to change the rules, and by providing unlawful advice before then, the Wisconsin Elections Commission has repeatedly failed to follow the law. They have disenfranchised voters and undermined the integrity of this election. We continue to be confident that when all of the legal ballots are counted and illegal ballots are not counted, President Trump will be proven the winner," Troupis said.

Earlier this week, Trump’s re-election campaign requested recounts in two Wisconsin counties, citing illegally altered absentee ballots, illegally issued absentee ballots, and "illegal advice given by government officials allowing Wisconsin’s Voter ID laws to be circumvented."

The recount is now underway and the tally is due before Dec. 1, when the state Elections Commission is set to certify the results.

The two counties – Milwaukee and Dane – were chosen because they are the sites with "the worst irregularities," the campaign said, adding that they have transferred $3 million to Wisconsin to cover the cost of the recounts.

"The Wisconsin Elections Commission directed Wisconsin municipal clerks to illegally alter incomplete absentee ballots contrary to Wisconsin law. Clerks were instructed that they could rely on their own 'personal knowledge,' or unspecified 'lists or databases at his or her disposal' to add in missing information on returned absentee ballots. Under Wisconsin law, incomplete absentee ballots may not be counted," the campaign said in a statement Wednesday.

A count of Wisconsin's 72 counties showed Democrat Joe Biden leading Trump by 20,608 votes. While that's a slim margin, a recount of the presidential votes in the equally tight election in 2016 resulted in a net change of 131 votes, meaning Trump won by fewer than 23,000 votes that year.

Trump lost handily in the two counties from which his campaign is demanding recounts. In Milwaukee County, Biden won 317,270 votes (69.4%) to Trump's 134,357 (29.4%). The result was even worse in Dane County, where Biden got 260,185 votes (75.7%) to Trump's 78,800 (22.9%).

“The people of Wisconsin deserve to know whether their election processes worked in a legal and transparent way," Troupis said. "Regrettably, the integrity of the election results cannot be trusted without a recount in these two counties and uniform enforcement of Wisconsin absentee ballot requirements. We will not know the true results of the election until only the legal ballots cast are counted."

"We will not stop fighting for transparency and integrity in our electoral process to ensure that all Americans can trust the results of a free and fair election in Wisconsin and across the country," Troupis said.

[aspasia]

This news article is misleading, relying on information that took place before the election commission met order the recount. Try this instead:

The commission argued over changes to its manual that provides guidance to local elections officials over how to conduct recounts. Ultimately, they decided not to reference the manual in the order, but they did update some parts to reflect accommodations for the coronavirus pandemic.

The commissioners deadlocked on making changes to the manual that Democrats and elections commission staff said would bring the guidance into line with current state law. Republicans balked, saying the guidelines should not be changed after Trump filed for the recount.

Their inability to agree leaves in place guidance that says absentee ballot applications must be approved as part of the recount, even though commission staff said that’s not required under the law. --linky

[SgtHooper]

Reminds me of growing up on the farm, where from time to time on a given Sunday, we’d hunt fox for pelts, the proceeds of which were donated to local charities. This was a time when fox were plentiful and allegedly had a huge impact on pheasants and other game birds, which were scarcer then hen’s teeth.

The way it occurred is, we’d get 20-30 hunters, load up in the back of grain trucks, and start dropping them off at certain distances apart around a section (a 1-mile square, for those of you in Rio Linda) and then start walking to the center. Eventually, AND safely, and foxes running around when we closed in, were terminated. Wouldn’t do that now, cuz I enjoy these beautiful animals. However, this technique sounds perfect around the borders of blue states!! Just needs more “hunters”!