[TennesseeProfessor]

To answer your question, no they don’t. They keep going on TV announcing they have tons of evidence, but the alleged evidence doesn’t seem to be making its way into court filings.

They have filed in Pennsylvania that they are not alleging that voter fraud occurred, only that fraud might have occurred. That is not going to convince people to disenfranchise millions of voters.

They have withdrawn their Michigan lawsuit.

Georgia is going to certify their results.

I voted for Trump twice, and was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt about voter fraud, but if they have any evidence they need to release it -— and should have already. And if they don’t have, they should stop muddying the waters. We don’t always win, but we should still support our Democratic Republic which includes allowing voters to decide which electors the states should appoint.

[Golden Eagle]

no they don’t.

Hey "professor" from TN. Go back to your liberal university environment, where you try to brainwash students, but it won't work here.

[Phillyred]

You support election fraud. Sell it somewhere else, wimp. I will NEVER accept Fraud Cho Biden as president. Have fun with that.

[central_va]

Mail in voting is defacto vote fraud.

[spetznaz]

You make good points. Unfortunately, and you probably know this, you will be attacked. However, and I am also certain you know this, those that attack you will use primarily ad hominem attacks on you (rather than on the points you made). They will call you names, but will not respond to (for example) Giuliani saying things on conferences (fraud) that he’s not willing to say under oath in a courtroom (eg what he said regarding Philly ‘not being a fraud case’).

And that is what worries me. If they were attacking your points that would make me more comfortable. Because it would mean your points are incorrect. Unfortunately - unfortunately - that is not the case, and it worries me.

My hope and prayer is that there really is some sort of 7D chess going on. President Trump is a great man, but he has made some mistakes in the people he’s selected in the past. I pray he didn’t make a mistake with Giuliani.

There is still time, but it’s short and I hope Mr Giuliani understands that while it’s nice and well to keep voters excited with ‘breaking’ news, that the real decisions will be made in the courts. Or maybe he knows that, and I’m not sure whether that’s a reassuring thing or not. My hope is Giuliani will pull an Adlai Stevenson, the former US ambassador to the UN during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Not in how Adlai was a weak person most of the time, but rather in how when all seemed lost Adlai stepped up and totally destroyed the Soviets at the UN and their case there were no missiles in Cuba.

May Giuliani pull a last minute Adlai, because for now he may be ‘winning’ on the Conservative forums and Gateway Pundit, but he needs to win in the courts.