“Probably at foundation of election fraud”
More weasel words. Yesterday Lin Wood said the Dominion system was “subject to manipulation.”
“Subject to” and “probably” are not definitive words that convey certainty. They indicate the speaker is not really committed to what he or she is about to say. It’s speculation.
I’m tired of this. What are these people being paid to do? Root out corruption and expose it with proofs that it occurred or merely stir up passions and create chaos and uncertainty? What is going on here?
Subject to and probably are legal terms. Its like calling some guy who beheaded people downtown with a thousand witnesses an alleged murderer.
It must be done that way in court cases.
Also in legal terms an election is invalid if it was subject to fraud, or probably was interfered with. All elections must be inviolate, an extremely high standard.
So at this point if the election is certified, we no longer have rule of law and the ballot box is closed.
Then the ammunition box is opened. That is history, hopefully not ours.