To: DUMBGRUNT
Sailing is relatively cheap as fuel goes, but you’re at the whim of the wind. This won’t catch on very fast, if at all. Sailing is MUCH slower than traditional shipping.
Perhaps we should lift restrictions on the use of nuclear fuel for engines? But no, that’ll never happen. That makes too much sense.
4 posted on
11/18/2020 12:57:42 PM PST by
rarestia
(Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
To: rarestia
Sailing is relatively cheap as fuel goes Fuel yes, but your personnel costs per ton will be astronomical.
9 posted on
11/18/2020 12:59:46 PM PST by
Petrosius
To: rarestia
Sailing is slower...and unpredictable. Zig-zag routes, doldrums, and erratic winds.
Might be great fun for passengers though once they realize this idea won't work for cargo. I love sailing.
To: rarestia
26 posted on
11/18/2020 1:37:28 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: rarestia
“Sailing is relatively cheap as fuel goes, but you’re at the whim of the wind.”
After reading the Patrick O’Brian series you get a feel for how much a sailing vessel was a the mercy of the winds. If the wind is blowing the wrong direction, you can’t even leave harbor, let alone get underway. And then there’s how many crew you need to man the sails. Modern health and safety can’t be too happy requiring sailors to trim sails during a storm.
31 posted on
11/18/2020 2:16:11 PM PST by
hanamizu
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson